Why Nike Needs to Cut Colin Kaepernick
Executive Summary
Nike’s decision to tap into “woke culture” and turn the out of work former NFL quarter Colin Kaepernick into a brand ambassador has been a controversial one since the sportswear company launched its Colin ad campaign in 2018. Nike needs to change the way it approaches its consumer base in America while simultaneously addressing the supply chain issues that have arisen as a result of COVID-19, which has caused major production problems for Nike in Asia. While Nike has been active in promoting the ultimate Trump antagonist in Colin Kaepernick, it is now time to bury the hatch and put America first but cutting ties with Kaepernick and opening up production in the US so as to 1) bring manufacturing back to America and solve the supply chain problems caused by the virus, and 2) to help put Americans back to work so that American consumers can get back to doing what they do best, which is buying. There may be resistance to change within Nike if this plan were to be implemented, so Kotter’s 8-Step model should be used to address and prevent potential resistance.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
Introduction 2
Literature Review 3
Application of the Theory to the Organization in Question 4
Conclusions 6
Recommendations 7
Bibliography and References 9
Introduction
Change management is about managing people and their reactions to change (Cameron & Green, 2015). However, the need for change is typically related to business issues and not necessarily to people. Thus for a company such as Nike to manage change internally it has to be able to cross that divide between business and people to make sure every stakeholder is on board with the change and that people are respected for their thoughts and feelings.
The problem that Nike faces today is twofold: 1) its use of Colin Kaepernick as an activist frontman for the brand has alienated conservative consumers; 2) its use of offshore labor has caused production nightmares now that COVID-19 has put nations in lockdown mode for the foreseeable future. Nike faces the problem of a dwindling consumer base in the US and a dwindling store of products. The solution is to bring jobs back to America and put laid-off Americans back to work so that they can go out and consume Nike products, which they will gladly do after seeing an about-face on Nike’s part.
This change is needed because the coronavirus has had a devastating effect on supply chains over the past three months since the outbreak of COVID-19 that started in China became a pandemic around the world. The current situation is untenable for companies like Nike that rely upon overseas labor for materials and production. It is understandable that some changes needed to be made for the foreseeable future as nations go into lockdown. But this is not a sustainable plan or strategy for companies that need laborers and supply chains. To maintain the livelihood of the nation at the same time that people are protected, changes need to be made. Transportation may be halted altogether in the coming months and years, which means Nike will need to ask major questions about how it plans to provide its products. The old way of relying on overseas labor or goods made overseas may have to come to an end. The US has been offshoring jobs for decades. Is it perhaps time for all jobs to return to the domestic labor market? Is it perhaps time for nations to become more isolationist...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now